The defense team for Daniel Penny delivered a decisive closing argument in the controversial subway chokehold trial, aiming to sway the jury with a powerful final statement. Penny, a former Marine, faces charges stemming from the death of Jordan Neely, who died after being restrained in a subway confrontation.

In their closing argument, the defense emphasized Penny’s actions as a response to what they argued was a clear and immediate threat to public safety. The team painted a picture of a chaotic situation where Penny acted to protect himself and others, asserting that his military training guided his instincts in a high-pressure moment. The prosecution countered by arguing that Penny’s use of force was excessive and unjustified.

The case now rests in the hands of the jury, whose decision could have significant implications for self-defense laws and public safety debates in high-stress environments.